http://m-simonyan.livejournal.com/57390.html
While the original format of BBC "News 24" was ruined, because of the endless repetition of
artificial news; it created less trust in the new format "news channel BBC"
where things are not much better .
Russia Today is gaining in both influence and the number of viewers in the UK, where
it is already affecting the segment of news topics on the BBC and other channels.
- At the same time, Russia Today , apparently fills that "international" gap that Al Jazeera has left a
blank after his initial success as a result of coverage of the war in Iraq and the first couple of cases,
the "Arab Spring."
Perhaps it is that Al Jazeera is a country that is not strong enough to withstand the onslaught of
threats and blackmail from the U.S. Foreign Service, and it pushed the Arab TV channel from
the pedestal of "independence." Today Qatar is leading in the arms trade in the Middle East,
along with Saudi Arabia and the United States.
On the other hand, Russia Today supports the former superpower, which allows it to much
compared to the other corner of the world TV channels to challenge U.S. dominance in the
field of news, which generates servile TV. Fall into this category, even BBC , when it comes
to international news. Most of its experts in Washington, and this did not change the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://m-simonyan.livejournal.com/57390.html
Slow Death BBC as an objective news channel for several years coincides with the explosive
growth of Russia Today , we deplore.
FORMAT
Leading Russia Today one of the first rose from their seats and began to walk around showing
items television equipment, which in the U.S. and the UK were always hidden behind the camera.
Correspondents BBC is not quickly pick up the news trends, while Russia's "star" TV journalists
(see below) appear to be more independent, fast and dedicated team.
APPEARANCE AND OPINIONS
It would be stupid not to notice that most of the presenters Russia Today cute and young.
This would bring accusations of sexism and harassment on the basis of age. But this seemingly
weak spot balanced boldness of their judgments. Women (and this is a very "feminine" channel)
have, apparently, his own opinion about what is happening and what opinion is now in tune with
the audience.
In the U.S., the UK and most of the European Union Mainstream television viewers can not even
get full information about the what is happening in their own countries, not to mention what
happens to their own countries. There is, apparently, the interest is to maintain the status quo,
even if the status quo is an urgent need to discuss.
channel Russia Today news makes that are worth seeing again. This is the other point of view.
CONTENTS
Let's face it. Russian TV presenters and reporters do not soften the language when criticizing
mistakes and errors of the U.S. and the EU in all endeavors in their foreign and domestic policy.
But who can blame it for Russia Today ? After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has kept
aside and not interfere in world politics, so she had plenty of time to observe what is happening.
And what happened, it did not look very nice. It is understood that the EU and the U.S. has
turned the world into their playground wars, bombings and financial collapse.
WAR AND PEACE
The difference may lie in the fact that Russia Today provides not only news, but an alternative
explanation of the causes and consequences of war and peace .
following topics are constantly appearing on the list of news that the Russian TV channel in the
last few years.
- the war in Afghanistan
- a war the United States and Britain in Iraq, illegal under international law
- war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan
- the use of depleted uranium in Fallujah
- captures and tortures
- Guantanamo
- the bombing of Pakistan and Yemen, U.S. drones
- anti-government demonstrations in Bahrain
- the war in Libya, illegal under international law
- the rhetoric and the preparations for war in Iran
- a revolution in Syria
- the rhetoric and the preparations for war in Syria
- a coup in Egypt
- US -British program of mass surveillance of the world
All of these developments have allowed Russia Today to present a different point of view than with
TV channels in the European Union and the United States, simply because Russia was not involved,
and has not yet been involved in any of them.
tv EU and the U.S. are compromised by they were forced to support the war effort of their own
governments. So it was with NATO in Afghanistan, the U.S. and Britain in Iraq and the United States,
Britain and France in Libya.
Twelve years of self-censorship had a negative effect on the audience involved in this country, besides
these days no one is stupid enough to not noted that on the news channels such as BBC , RAI , CBS
ABC , CNN , ITV , SKY TV and French Antenne , lacks a heavy criticism of foreign policy.
recent success for Russia Today was the fact that none other than "the devil in the flesh, "Vladimir Putin
was more in tune with the British and the American electorate, while David Cameron and Barack Obama
is going to give the course of the bombing of Syria, which in the end, to their infinite shame, has been canceled.
BANK COLLAPSE
These news topics and so would provide enough material for a different approach in the news Russia Today .
But the collapse of the bank in the U.S. and the UK, followed by those in these countries appeared movement Occupy , in addition protests by students and workers in Greece, Italy, France and Portugal have provided editors Russia Today supplementary materials
intact.
It was obvious that something rotten going on in the Western financial system and that the traditional news
programs do not cover events with sufficient criticality.
In fact, to see a mass movement Occupy America and the UK, BBC , SKY , CBS and ABC took at
least a month.
If they did not report it right when it happening now - even less. Now it appears not so clearly as the
original camps were forcibly demolished by local police - that gave the Russian TV channel even more
timely news and was greeted with silence Mainstream TV channels.
# Snowden
Apostasy Edward Snowden and his heavy baggage information have become a godsend for Russia,
which reluctantly got involved in the case. It allowed her to address the defense of freedom of speech
and freedom itself.
If Snowden remained in the United States or went to "friendly" countries such as the UK, it would be
thrown in jail, as it was with Chelsea Manning (formerly known as the Bradley Manning) and
Julian Assange.
While Assange remains under house arrest in a foreign embassy in London, and Manning is serving a
35-year sentence in an American prison, Snowden is in Moscow a free man and can, if they wish,
to go at least as far as Siberia, without fear that his arrest team for the disposal unit "sea lion" of the
U.S. Navy.
Another man who was telling the truth and is now in U.S. custody - it's John Kyriakou.
He made whistleblower program torture by the CIA.
Cases Snowden, Manning and Assange Kyriakou widely reported by Russia Today .
But not just covered, as is done in the BBC , giving it a few seconds. They allowed the first news
in a few weeks.
DOCUMENTARY
views and opinions that are expressed in most of the documentaries that show on Russia Today ,
- not Russian, and American.
These documentaries are producing in the U.S., but do not get spread out there or what any of the
British TV channels.
If the BBC is required for many months and millions of pounds to produce documentaries that fit into
the official editorial policy of the BBC (not particularly critical in respect of anything and always stress
that our society is much better than the others), the Russia Today has produced documentaries in the
"independent" sector of the U.S. and the world. These are ideological, rigid, very attracting
documentaries that no progress on the traditional democratic Mainstream television media.
illuminating issues of poverty, war, bank fraud, unemployment and environmental pollution.
All of these topics - "no-go" for most of the Western television channels.
Have you ever seen Documentaries directed against Monsanto , the U.S. or UK TV?
We do not think so, because even the U.S. Congress approved the law on which Monsanto
as a company and its executives are exempt from any prosecution in court if their crops in 50 years
will be toxic. Russia Today aired a series of stunning documentaries about genetically modified crops culture.
On the BBC about this and did not hear.
Russia Today only covered two global march against Monsanto , which took place in more than 400 cities.
The event was honored with a little note in the newsBBC and ITV , and it concerned only a demonstration
at Parliament Square in London in their sections.
EDITORIAL POLICY OF RUSSIA TODAY
editorial policies of Russia Today is not visible immediately, but within it has to reconcile a number of
conflicting news, such as problems gay men in the country and the conclusion of Pussy Riot activists of
Greenpeace .
However, while Russia keeps his distance from interfering in the affairs of the world the scale of
Iraq or Libya, editors, Russia Today will be easy to seem independent.
contrast to this stands the fact that the influential post of trust fund BBC has recently been given to the
former Conservative Party member Chris Pettenu. His personally chosen British Prime Minister
David Cameron.
Thereafter Patten appointed not one but two CEOs BBC . First, the ill-fated George Entwistle,
and after a couple of months - Tony Hall after the dramatic events that have tarnished the "independent"
reputation BBC .
During the last months and years BBC preferred to specialize more on domestic news, such as the
Olympics and the events connected with the royal family, as well as by far the revolutions abroad
than on the views that are critical of government policies.
ZVEDNYE JOURNALISTS RUSSIA TODAY
Their names are given to them in the microblog Twitter .
@ MaxKeiser and @ StaceyHerbert
Leading his well-known program, which is presented as " the market! Finance! Scandal! ",
- Keiser Report . She told the British and other countries about what is really going on behind the scenes
of London and Wall Street under the protection of our own governments. Must watch if you want to
learn about # banksters - "bankers and robbers", and produced their transactions.
@ AbbyMartin
Leads program Breaking the Set. She looks amazing in their shoes with high heels and tight T-shirts.
But wait. She does not hesitate when you need to stick a sharp pin in the heart of the problem,
and it is usually driven by dirty methods of war, the U.S.,Monsanto , drones and legalized bank
fraud and chicanery of the U.S. government.
anything even remotely similar happens on any channel in the EU and the U.S.. Journalists are there
on a short leash. If Abby gave vent to the television guide in these countries, they all appear on the
buttocks to the marks of the studs.
At stud on BBC clearly not the same power of penetration that Abby Martin with Russia Today .
@ Gayane _ RT
Gayane Chichakyan more often appears in Washington, but sometimes in Moscow. Excellent reporting.
In a case argued, with his opinion. Gayane is easy to cope with internal and external policies of the U.S.
and the UK and enthusiastically seizes this opportunity.
@ Yulisha
right. Agreed. Yulia Shapovalov incredibly attractive. However, the leading news BBC Fiona Bruce -
too. Apparently, a certain amount of physical attractiveness - Today on TV norm.
difference lies in the fact that they are allowed to speak, and how freely, according to their feelings,
they can say what they think. But if you have a television conservatives and defenders of the status quo
, they will always say things like that it is protected and make it boring.
Here's a pretty picture, butleading news ITV - Nina Hussein.
British television journalists should feel free to respond to requests impartial public.
They were all surprised by the public outcry against the bombing of Syria, in the same way as the
2008 banking collapse caught them by surprise. This year, many TV reporters first called bloody coup
in Egypt a "revolution." Despite numerous misrepresentations, British TV stubbornly remains uncritical media.
difference is that @ Yulisha covers news with a sense of poise and. It looks more freely with his fellow
British television. When the U.S. or Britain are doing something wrong, you clearly give this figure.
On the other hand, Fiona Bruce Edwards and Huh excellent when reporting news about the royal family
- birthdays, weddings and births. In this, they are not pobesh. A true sense of self, we acknowledge.
LIGHTING EVENT IN LONDON
@ sarafirth _ RT , @ Polly _ Boiko and @ LauraSmith _ RT
We can not finish this research news channel Russia Today , without mention of their three London fighters
- Sarah Firth, Polly Boiko and Lore Smith.
We have to regularly check what they say may be because the blog Arbolioto is from London.
All three are the first to appear with their microphones in places with really big news, but ones that are
afraid to take over their mainstream TV. This movementOccupy , marches against Monsanto ,
unemployment, marches and protests against the National Health Service, marches for nuclear
disarmament and marches coalition Stop the War , an interview with Julian Assange, fraudulent
transactions "of bankers and robbers", camps Frack _ Off and much, much more.
So strong is their unflagging interest, if you want to know something about the protest against the
health care system, first look Russia Today .
CRITICISM RUSSIA TODAY
Many people have noticed how Russia Today influenced modern telejournalism, covering international
events without editorial framework. However, they claim that it is "the Kremlin's propaganda machine."
The point, however, is that while this channel reports are facts which we can not see on our own channels,
it will continue to gain momentum.
This is a fact that a wide range of correspondents Russia Today all over the world has caused a renewed
interest in television journalism without borders and banners. At least for the moment.
not think that it's only lead. Alain Minkowski intercepted Hard The Alyona Show on Russia Today and
made the flagship program of gossip on the Huffington Post . Not everyone in journalism define money.
IN CONCLUSION
For the reasons related to the size of the paper, we have named only a few stellar journalists Russia Today .
Other names worthy of attention,
mention CrossTalk Peter Lavelle. He finds interesting people from different parts of the world,
as well as the Keiser Report . Surprisingly, the BBC and other British and American TV channels
they never find, especially in light of the fact that these guests excellent talk
METHODS