“As the final defeat of Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL] in Syria draws near, it becomes increasingly more evident who really fights Islamic State and who just imitates a fight for three years,” he said. “Even if the US-led coalition is not willing to fight terrorism in Syria, it should at least not prevent those who really do that consistently and effectively [from fighting terrorist groups].” https://www.rt.com/news/403815-syria-russia-opposition-usa/
The demands from the NATO/military-industrial complex-funded Atlantic Council and neocon hawks for RT and Sputnik to be forced to register as ‘foreign agents’ in the US, brings to mind similarly disturbing events which took place in the 'Land of the Free’ in the early 1950s.
The phrase has become a mantra, to be repeated (with all the correct arm movements and feigned expressions of outrage), by anyone wanting to be regarded as a "credible" foreign policy commentator in the elite western media.
In this video Hilary Clinton admits that the US government created and funded Al-Qaeda in order to fight the soviet union, and she even considers that as a good thing. But she claims that the Americans are fighting Al-Qaeda nowadays. If you really fighting Al-Qaeda, then who are the scums and terrorists you used in order to topple the government of Qaddafi in Libya. . The American media describes "Aldel Hakim Belhaj" as an x-terrorist or as an x-jihadist. How funny and hypocrite! Did his brain develop suddenly? or what are the marks that made him an x-Jihadist? There is only one reason: The American needed him, so they whitened his page and he became suddenly an x-Jihadist. Wait a couple of years to see him again an active Jihadist when the Americans don't need his services. Al-Qaeda didn't leave the US government bed. Let us review the history and see that Al-Qaeda acts served only the US foreign policy. Al-Qaeda terrorists are multipurpose fighters who are being used efficiently by the US government. . Want to know who is the father of Al-Qaeda: Watch this:
When Madeline McCann went missing her parents were allegedly dining out with the confirmed paedophile Clement Fraud, whilst the apparently ultra satanic Podesta Brothers (John was Obama's chief adviser and also Hilary Clinton campaign manager) who match the chief suspects description were said to be staying at Fraud's apartment. The police have not investigated this yet and the media is silent except for reporting on the McCanns dining out with the now deceased Fraud.
If you think the government, media and law enforcers are not controlled and inhabited by pure evil, you've undoubtedly been brainwashed to believe what your masters tell you!
We are often told that the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the war in Syria are disastrous failures of Western foreign policy. This article, however, argues that the architects of these wars were, and are, well aware of the destabilising consequences of their military efforts, and in fact, had always regarded the breakup of Iraq and Syria along sectarian lines as a desirable outcome. The millions of deaths and injuries resulting from these horrific wars, as well as the displacement of several more millions, then, are nothing more than “collateral damage” to achieve US-Israeli hegemony in the region. Viewed from this perspective, post-9/11 Western Middle East policy in retrospect is not a failure, but a success.
What an appalling insult to the Chinese!- no doubt noted and will never be forgotten. Trump shows his total lack of breeding, education, intelligence and diplomacy...God help us all!
The Chinese do not act on emotions, this was taken to task. However they do act on facts.
Exactly what I thought. Has he never heard about the Chinese and how they feel about a loss of 'face'. He insulted the leader of a great power and gloried in it. No wonder XI asked for the remark to be translated again - he could hardly believe his ears.
Trump says that he was faced with a dilemma – whether to inform Xi, who “was eating the cake, and was silent” of the attack.
“What does he do, finish his dessert and go home and then they say, you know, the guy you just had dinner with just attacked a country?” Trump mused, and then told his counterpart the news.
“He [Xi] paused for 10 seconds and then he asked the interpreter to please say it again. I didn't think that was a good sign,” said Trump. “And he said to me, anybody that uses gases - you could almost say or anything else - but anybody that was so brutal and uses gases to do that young children and babies, it's OK.”
Trump spoke of a “great feeling” between himself and Xi, who he “really likes being with,” at least officially.
China issued no clear position on the US strike on April 7, merely calling for a peaceful resolution to the Syrian crisis. Xi has avoided commenting.
Trump also bragged about the effectiveness of the strike, which was a response to a chemical attack blamed on government forces two days earlier, saying that “all” of the missiles hit their target, the Shayrat airbase. Syrian media said seven staff and nine civilians were killed in the strike.
“It's so incredible. It's brilliant. It's genius. Our technology, our equipment, is better than anybody by a factor of five. I mean look, we have, in terms of technology, nobody can even come close to competing,” said Trump.
Russia, an ally of Syria, earlier claimed that only 23 Tomahawks struck their targets. Moscow also condemned the assault, arguing that no solid evidence was provided that Syrian forces were indeed responsible for launching the chemical attack, or that one had even taken place.