Monday, 2 March 2015

Was Nemtsov killed because his cover as a Kremlin asset was blown?



Political senselessness of Nemtsov's murder is obvious. It will not cause a wave of popular anger, nor attempts to change the state order. Criticisms by Boris Nemtsov looked so naive, that played into the hands of the authorities, putting down the opposition in the eyes of citizens. He was not only harmless, but in this sense, even useful. With such enemies, as they say, there is no need for friends.

In general, there is something wrong with the fifth column in Russia. In other countries they have many supporters, they fight for influence and keep the ruling party in tone. In Russia, despite all the buckets of mud, regularly poured by the liberals on the heads of the Kremlin leaders, their value is dropping rapidly day by day.

All anti-government activities somehow are unpopular. Attempts to organize marches and rallies do not gather many participants. The statements of leading "leftist" activists more often provoke laughter, so powerless they are in their malevolence, and their arguments cause vague doubts about the level of their education. The speakers are only concerned about flexing their intellectual qualities, and not presenting their position or supporting the discussion. In some cases, their speech is so tactless that it humiliates not the opponents, but the speakers.

Probably, our overseas partners did not expect such a toothless opposition, when they embedded it on the Russian expanses. Pragmatic America needs results, and they are not interested in nurturing agents, who then become losers, and discredit the very idea of the opposition. And if our opponents, so sophisticated in their evil, resort to such cruel and bloody provocations and sacrificial murders, in fact, such actions are not useless. It's just that their reason and purpose are not what they seem.

The idea for the murder was likely given by Nemtsov himself. On February 10, in the interview, he, under the influence of some fatal impulse, cited his mother's concerns about Putin. And although he didn't talk about the direct threat, as it turned out, the pretext was immediately taken advantage of [turns out the idea about a threat from Putin was just imagination of the editors]. No sooner said than done. This suggests that the murder was planned in advance, and the careless allusion was just a convenient trigger.

One of the theories of the tragedy was suggested by the most popular internet-analysts: Nemtsov's murder is a way to inspire the lazy opposition for more important feats. In other words, the liberals are not giving their money's worth. Russian Maidan is not materializing, a coup is not even a thought in a very distant future. And the main thing that annoys Western revolution specialists is the rating of the Russian President which does not want to fall. It is not clear in this case what their "proxys" are engaged in. 

With specific regard to Nemtsov - his passionate rhetoric was more amusing and seemed like a game, not sharp, but deliberately ridiculous. It's as if he specifically chose completely implausible accusations against his opponents that look ridiculous in the eyes of the Russian public. And though long and strong ties of Boris Nemtsov with the United States are not to be questioned, his behavior was somehow not American. This is not the style of State Department - he has no malice, nor aggression, nor inhuman cold pragmatism of the New World.

I wonder why he was not corrected? Where were all his speechwriters and image-makers? Why his friends-liberals did not push him away, if he could not cope with the responsibility to discredit the government, and Putin in particular? I think, if not the opposition itself, then its American owners should have long ago gotten rid of the politician, who shows them in an unfavorable light.

However, according to relatives and friends, Boris Efimovich was not a naive critic of the Kremlin. Why would he? Education of a physical scientist in any case provides a good logical basis and sober thinking. Besides, after a long and varied political career, he should have gained some experience. But then such attacks in the spirit of the offended third grader are hardly the fault of Nemtsov - it seems that he, mildly speaking, was playing a fool on purpose. Such a teenage style, which painted an overall very primitive level of the Russian opposition, was chosen not accidentally.

Pay attention to the sincerity of grief over the death of Boris Nemtsov. The crowd on the bridge and the mountain of flowers is genuine. On the background of a general dislike of liberals, who, are often, deservedly so, considered collaborators, compassion expressed for Nemtsov, killed under explicitly political circumstances, suggests that his anti-government position is not so simple - people cannot be deceived. The true traitor of the Motherland will not have so much sympathy.

The murder itself has too many oddities, as always in such cases. And yet it is not like ordinary domestic or political case:

- witness left alive,

- too many shots,

- the shots fired at the back (a killer, especially in such close contact, shoots in the front in the area of the heart)

- too many mistakes,

- there is no final shot to the head,

- very suspicious snowplow.

At the same time the precision of actions is astounding. Likely the route and the timing of the snowplow was calculated. Deliberate negligence allowed in order to divert suspicion from the involvement of any special agencies. A clear handwriting makes it easier to find a professional. As in the July false flag on a subway, everything was done too unprofessionally. And, despite the apparent amateurism, in both cases, the crime was successful.

Hardly a politician with such experience as Nemtsov, could easily bite on a fake model beauty, and even from Ukraine. Of course, a honey trap could work. But to sit with her in a café in the open, and then walk the streets in downtown Moscow - why so openly demonstrate your relationship to the public? Most likely, the girl promised some sort of "extremely important" information about the next Kiev provocation, which she could not share in the walls of an apartment or office. Then asked for a meeting in a public place. Very naturally.

By the way, if you didn't notice, the information about the activities of Nemtsov in connection with the Ukrainian crisis began to leak online only after his death. According to experts, it is not very clear in what capacity he appeared in Kiev. The fact of his engagement in such a serious business testifies to a rather high profile of Boris Nemtsov, and certainly not about his stupidity.

Let's start with the fact that such a well-known and strongly associated with America politician would simply be blocked from access to Kiev, if he really could somehow interfere there with the interests of Russia. In connection with the war in Novorossia, which is already for a year hanging on the brink of WWIII, Putin is playing an incredibly fragile game on the edge of a razor blade, not allowing the warring parties to slip into fiery chaos. And anyone who decided to rudely interrupt and disturb the delicate balance would be dealt with not now, but a year ago or even earlier. Hence, Nemtsov's visit to Kiev and his "friendship" with Poroshenko in fact did not contradict the Russian political discourse.

Then why did he take on such a strange task - for many years to represent a character, which is likely to appeal to the Ukrainian rulers? Essentially, he played the role of major politician from Russia, who, being in opposition to the government really wants to help the "emerging Kiev democracy"; the role of sincere opponent and a personal enemy of the Russian President (remember his behavior at the beginning of 2012). Even the level of his statements has been adjusted specifically for the lowered by the Western psychotherapists intelligence of ukra-idiots.

It turns out, for example, that Boris Efimovich simply played Poroshenko about the "evidence of the presence of Russian military in Ukraine". A perfect excuse to enter the trust circle - of course, the junta immediately got on the hook of such a valuable informant. So far such evidence has not even been provided by the CIA. Why would Nemtsov suddenly have it? It turns out that he deliberately deceived the Kiev authorities. The only explanation - it was a good disguise to infiltrate behind enemy lines. The result is known to all: the defeat of the Ukrainian troops, ending of hostilities and the Minsk agreement, meaning fiasco of the State Department policy in Ukraine.

From all the above, it follows that Nemtsov's actions, judging by their results, were not at all directed against Putin. But then all of his emotional criticisms addressed to the President, mysterious trips to Kiev, contacts with overseas partners and their proteges was only a smokescreen. The real activities of Boris Nemtsov were carried out under the opposite ideological banner. And his true goals look in a completely different light:

1. Discrediting the Russian opposition.

2. Embedding in the midst of the Kiev junta, which led to the failure of the American mission in Ukraine.

There may only be one conclusion: the staunch opposition leader Boris Nemtsov actually was an agent and an informer of the Kremlin.

His murder was not a sacrifice to accuse Putin, although, of course, our "friends" will not miss such an opportunity. This is not to scare the poorly performing liberals, although the murder must play this role as well. After several failures in Ukraine and in the activities of the fifth column, the foreign intelligence agencies finally found the "mole" and realized that Nemtsov actually worked for the Kremlin, passing back information directly from the camp of the enemy and preventing provocations.

The inglorious end of the ATO, the success of Minsk, the failure of the Russian Maidan - is largely to his credit. The stupid behavior of Ukrainian generals is explained not only by their incompetence, but also by the false information about Russian intentions supplied to them. To supply them with fakes of such level could only be done by a prominent Russian politician, whom the junta fully trusted. And when our American competitors learned about it, of course, they were furious and brutally murdered the agent under their nose, who was one of the most true friends of Putin. 

Now it is obvious why for a leading role of a seasoned opposition leader was nominated such a safe figure, without a political weight. Most likely, Nemtsov quite a long time ago was just slipped to the fifth column and the Western and American intelligence agencies, standing behind it. And embedded him in terms of his "proximity to the Emperor". That is, the game was not double, but triple. Of course, it went on for quite a long time. And, of course, even the closest people were not aware of it.

The immediate cause of the murder - the involvement of Nemtsov in the next provocation. His proximity to the government showed the enemy how to use him to strike at the heart of the Kremlin. The ideological basis of the next plot was a disagreement of quite high-ranking figures with the Russian foreign policy course and the resulting inevitable economic reforms. Not everyone has unconditionally accepted import substitution, the apparent pivot to the state control and a return to some socialist principles of the social structure. However, Nemtsov, according to his relatives, was in principle against any radical solutions and bloody massacres. He was trying to prevent another, clearly failed provocation, dissuading his liberal colleagues. This caused suspicion from his curators, a thorough investigation and ruthless elimination.

Nemtsov was killed on the background of the Kremlin towers, in order to first, show that he was outed, and secondly, to demonstrate that the next one may be someone behind the Kremlin walls.

The genuine sorrow and indignation of the Russian authorities is clear - they know who really was Nemtsov and why he died. The loss of such a devoted colleague, especially associated with the most significant projects of the enemy, in such a dangerous time is irreplaceable. The cries of the Kiev junta are understandable: the puppets will not be notified of the master's affairs.

This article is largely inspired by the need to rehabilitate the good name of Boris Nemtsov. Often for truth and honesty you have to pay the highest price - life. Unfortunately, in such cases, only death breaks the veil of mystery and remains the only argument in favor of the truth, but not always.



  • While I definitely do not like the very biased positive of the author towards nemtsov, it seems obvious that the author has some strong points.
    I would, however, paint a somewhat more differentiated picture and some explanatory context.
    Unlike some I do not believe that nemtsov was an honest player and patriot. From what we can see he was a wheeler and dealer in pretty everything he did.
    And he was doubtlessly intelligent.
    Let's have a quick look at the big picture.
    In 2004 Putin starts to fight to bring Russia back from her laying on her back by stopping the brutal plundering of Russias natural resources by the usa.
    About 8 years later, having just won again the presidency, Putin starts a new phase of playing increasingly harder.
    While the western media blabber ad nauseam about their masturbatory nato significance natos actual threatening capacity, in fact, is rather insignificant. Russias real problem, the mercilessly suffocating rope around Russias neck is something else; it's the 5th column. Putin, of course, knows that as well as he knows that the usa will soon start new trouble in their relentless drive to keep their parasitic hegemony up.
    That in my minds eye would be the point where arrangements for a very private conversation between nemtsov and someone trusted in Putins inner circle are made.
    The deal is simple and roughly along the lines of "Boris Efimovich, you are a very bright man but also a man who, in part due to historic circumstances, has slid down almost to political insignificance. Wouldn't the politician in yourself love to have a second chance, a new start? Obviously that would require a major effort, considering both your situation and Russias situation. Why not turn what is now a disadvantage to an advantage for Russia as well as for yourself?"
    How did the ukraine nazi criminals find out the game? Simple, too (Stick to Occams razor!). What do you think is the weak point of a man who with 55 still needs not just pretty girls but famous pretty girls? I wouldn't postulate that his madame de plaisir was an agent from the beginning, maybe not even - knowingly - at the end. But she might have been under surveillance or she might have been into having a lose tongue by "friends" in kiev.
    Why wasn't she killed? Because there was no need. Either she knew perfectly well that nothing and nobody could protect her should she chose to carelessly talk or she was part of the game anyway.
    Am I too simplistic? Maybe but I have good reasons. People aren't driven by complex constellations. They are driven by simple factors. By hunger. By greed. by fear.
    "Cui bono" is an important question. But so is the "why", the question for the motives.
      see more
      • Avatar
        So the message to Russia's liberal arm of opposition: up your game or the US will 'sanction' you permanently. Especially if you are considered a Russian agent. . (not sure I can subscribe to that theory, but is an interesting thought)
          • Avatar
            The knowing of 'facts' by Boris N. is the weak point in this argument. 
            Any connection of him to the Kremlin would be known. His lifestyle defied any connection to special services, much less to VV Putin.
            The storyline works for a Netflix TV series, superbly.
            In reality, you don't risk war with NATO, your regime, your nation, with a weakling like this guy as your 'mole', doubled or tripled.
            He has been in descent for years.
            This weaving of a mantle of smarts, cleverness, and patriotic usefulness is ingenious by the author. But it lacks truth. Not even the semblance of a fact. Just good fictive writing.
            It is unnecessary to have someone inside Kiev to deceive the Ukies. They don't run the show. The CIA Station Chief, the ambassador from US govt. and the big business players inside and outside Kiev are running the show. Whispering in Poroschenko's ear is the wrong orifice. He takes it in another opening. Stuff his pockets and have a go at Porky's butt. So why send a mole to Porky? No one listens to him. He has less power than the inept Boris N.
            The next chapter, I suggest, will be Porky's "end". If he defies Putin and breaks the Minsk 2 agreement, leads another offensive to its inevitable disaster, he will be gone. Probably, his plane will hit that snowplow or merely be mistakenly shot out of the sky. We know that plan is foolproof. The authorities can take several years to investigate, and by then Ukraine will be gone.
            In its place, a large escort service featuring young, nubile, amnesiac honeys. Ukraine does that export very well. All natural, no GMOs, as yet.
              see more
              • Avatar
                Elementary, my dear Watson... Everybody is a double agent! Even your mom lol
                  • Avatar
                    Such a lengthy summary..but was it he who was shot? If so.. why does the guy on the pavement have a beer belly... when all recent photos of Nemstov show six-pack abs and bodybuilding poses?
                      • Avatar
                        What an interesting and thought provoking article.
                          • Avatar
                            we know as common widely accepted facts in the general media that Nemtsov was close to the Kremlin and had high ranking contacts in the Kiev Junta.
                            what else is there to know.
                            The author has scraped away the dirt to reveal the shining nugget of truth underneath.
                              • Avatar
                                The story make sense. If true, Nemtsov must have known an told the who an how of MH 17. Explaining the silence on all fronts. The Crimea take over to showed the gifted hand of knowing before. In fact, the oil, Ruble, downgrading, must have been in his sight to. Making time to prepare for it. Leaving the exceptional president an generals seeing Russians everywhere.
                                  • Avatar
                                    MH17? Whatcha on about?
                                    The close-up photos of the side panel of the cockpit, taken immediately after the crash by Canadian/Ukrainian Michael Bociurkiw are in the public domain... also at Global Research. Michael was part of a special OSCE team sent there to negotiate access to the crash site. He was interviewed by CBC Canada, and this was published in The New Straits Times, in Malaysia and Singapore.
                                    Michael's photo shows the cockpit side panel had holes in it made by what appeared to have been one air to air missile that clearly 'aimed' exactly where the Captain sat. (No missile from 30,000 feet below could aim that accurately)! The side cockpit had also been raked with heavy (30mm)? machine guns. Some of the metal from these bullet holes was bent in, some bent out, indicating that 2 fighters must had fired, one from each side of MH17. There was also a bullet graze on the top of left wing, directed towards the Captain.
                                    Retired anti-aircraft missile specialist Colonel Bernd Biedermann in an article for the New Germany newspaper says that had splinters from a surface to air missile hit the plane, it would have immediately caught fire.
                                    There were no eyewitness reports of the necessary 30 minute black smoke trail a BUK missile leaves, BUT BBC did interview eyewitnesses who saw a jet fighter escorting an airliner.
                                      • Avatar
                                        The Dutch explained the holes as made by foreign matter. leaving the hand of E.T as possibility. When it happened thy really believed their new found Kiev friends. And were blaming, not openly, Putin. Their upgraded their status to grieving while calling for international investigation. The same as Russia did. The facts did hurt them tremendously. Worst, thy called for boycotts hurting them to. My country ,right, then wrong, followed by stupid.

                                      No comments:

                                      Post a Comment