Greenpeace's latest propaganda bulletin states that 30 million barrels of oil
(1.26 billion gallons) are spilled in Russia every year,
which is seven times the amount spilled by the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Sounds scary doesn't it!
Makes you want to support Greenpeace and everything they do, doesn't it!
No need to even research it your thinking, as Greenpeace do all that for you - Am I Right?
Russian spillages are probably much higher than that!
So what am I getting at you'll be thinking now.
The Standard Oil trademark is now owned by Chevron
The company responsible for the Ecuador disaster!
Chevron deliberately emptied out over 428 million barrels (18 Billion gallons)
of Toxic sludge in to the Ecuadorian Jungle.
To this day the Ecuadorians have received no help with the clean up,
no compensation despite Chevron being found guilty,
and Greenpeace have hardly even commented on it never mind campaigned for justice!
So in a nutshell - Greenpeace think 30 million barrels of oil per year
accidentally spilled in Russia, is worse than 428 million barrels of the considerably more
polluting toxic sludge deliberately pumped in to the Ecuadorian Jungle over a 26 year period
BESIDES the unknown amount of spilt oil!
(Greenpeace give no time frame or empirical evidence on Russian spills)
Still not convinced of Greenpeace propaganda
reaching depths of depravity never witnessed on the planet before?
Think of how big Ecuador is in comparison to Russia,
and the biodiversity there compared to the whole of Russia.
If Greenpeace's facts are correct, russian oil spills are a drop in the ocean
compared to the environmental catastrophe caused by the Chevron criminals;
that will ooze past the Galapagos Islands forever!
The True Story of Chevron's Ecuador Disaster
Further viewing - Remember Greenpeace have to balance their corporate sponsors requirements of cutting the world population and ensuring economic prosperity for their Illuminati masters, whilst at the same time appear to be environmental to ensure the general public are brainwashed in to their corporate funded ideology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aCf8AXJHu-U#t=23
The only controversial part of Patrick Moore's 'argument' against #greenpeace, is his views on genetic modification, which is great work :) Though Greenpeace obviously can't support his view that GMO rice is needed in India because there won't be any profit in it for their corporate funders, whilst they have to be against it elsewere because it would make it too obvious that they are complete scum! Personally I think Patrick has to accept that it's certain parts of India's etc fault that their population has spiralled out of control and so the education of women has to be prioritised so they have less kids #PopnMatters http://philsreport.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/greenpeace-propaganda-reaches-depths-of.html
ReplyDeleteDon't waste time on replying to the brainwashed illuminati fed puppets, just redirect them to my blog and tell them to put greenpeace in to my search engine for re-educating - theirs no hope for them though so just concentrate on educating your peers and young people around the world. Trust me, all the young people I know that have grown up with the internet are not desperate to have meaning in their life by supporting something that just sounds good on the tin lol. http://philsreport.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/greenpeace-propaganda-reaches-depths-of.html #greenpeace
ReplyDeleteDon't worry #Fukuppy, being as U R so cute #Greenpeace will save you by scaling all those #Japanese ships #LMFUKUPPYO http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/fukuppy-fukushima-industries-new-mascot-is-branding-disaster-8881883.html
ReplyDeletehttp://rt.com/in-vision/chevron-protest-us-ecuador/
ReplyDelete5077377 2011-07-26 19:57:53 Re: [alpha] INSIGHT - RUSSIA - financial view for the week
ReplyDeletezeihan@stratfor.com alpha@stratfor.com
anyone else find it odd that non-american markets are weak because of the
debt ceiling talks? ?=\
On 7/26/11 12:50 PM, Reginald Thompson wrote:
New source who is suppose to start regularly sending me his company's
financial analysis on Russia. It is pretty technical stuff.
CODE: RU187
PUBLICATION: yes
ATTRIBUTION: Stratfor sources in Moscow
SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Chief Strategist with UralSib Financial Corporation
SOURCE RELIABILITY: B
ITEM CREDIBILITY: 2
DISSEMINATION: Alpha
HANDLER: Lauren
All markets will open Monday nervously and weaker after the news of a
breakdown in the US debt talks. Investors in Russia and Europe will wait
to see how the US markets open before making any major decisions. That
said, weakness should be relatively modest as there is a strong
consensus that a debt deal will be agreed before the August 2nd deadline
and while that almost certainly will only be a stop-gap measure, it
should
5168114 2011-07-26 19:50:31 [alpha] INSIGHT - RUSSIA - financial view for the week
reginald.thompson@stratfor.com alpha@stratfor.com
New source who is suppose to start regularly sending me his company's
financial analysis on Russia. It is pretty technical stuff.
CODE: RU187
PUBLICATION: yes
ATTRIBUTION: Stratfor sources in Moscow
SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Chief Strategist with UralSib Financial Corporation
SOURCE RELIABILITY: B
ITEM CREDIBILITY: 2
DISSEMINATION: Alpha
HANDLER: Lauren
All markets will open Monday nervously and weaker after the news of a
breakdown in the US debt talks. Investors in Russia and Europe will wait
to see how the US markets open before making any major decisions. That
said, weakness should be relatively modest as there is a strong consensus
that a debt deal will be agreed before the August 2nd deadline and while
that almost certainly will only be a stop-gap measure, it should still
allow for a better market backdrop in August. Asia's markets are down, on
average, by 1.0% at mid session today partly as those markets had already
closed on Friday when concerns s
5168141 2011-07-26 20:36:18 Re: [alpha] INSIGHT - RUSSIA - financial view for the week
zeihan@stratfor.com alpha@stratfor.com
the debate is that a US collapse means the end of the US dominated system
and the rise of something....else
that....else would mean a lot of money somewhere other than the US
anywho, it just find it curious that even when the US is supposedly the
cause of all the problems, the US market keeps skipping along
On 7/26/11 1:36 PM, Bayless Parsley wrote:
Why would a U.S. economic meltdown make people outside the U.S. feel
neutral to positive?
On 7/26/11 1:33 PM, Peter Zeihan wrote:
well -- supposedly -- the US economy is about to have a meltdown (not
what im saying, what the conventional wisdom is)
logically, the US market should be quaking and the others should be
neutral to positive as money flows out of the US
On 7/26/11 1:27 PM, Bayless Parsley wrote:
why is it odd?
the stability of the U.S. economy fundamentally affects the rest of
the world economy
On 7/26/11 12:57 PM, Peter Zeihan wrote:
99356 2011-07-26 20:35:35 Re: [alpha] INSIGHT - RUSSIA - financial view for the week
bayless.parsley@stratfor.com alpha@stratfor.com
Which I don't find odd. It makes perfect sense that if an outsider looks
at the US and thinks shit is about to fall apart, he starts to get very,
very uncomfortable about the potential ripple effects.
On 7/26/11 1:29 PM, Lauren Goodrich wrote:
the "perception" of the US economy, not just the real stability of it.
The global perception is that we're about to collapse. Who cares if it
is true, bc the perception is scaring everyone.
On 7/26/11 1:27 PM, Bayless Parsley wrote:
why is it odd?
the stability of the U.S. economy fundamentally affects the rest of
the world economy
http://rt.com/usa/bp-oil-tar-mat-328/
ReplyDeleteOooooooo so this is why Greenpeace supporters don't do anything against corporate USA http://philsreport.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/army-manual-for-re-education-camps.html
ReplyDeleteI WONDER WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS GREENPEACE PROTEST http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2011/11/18/greenpeace-protests-chevron-oil-spill-off-brazil/
ReplyDeletehttp://www.activistcash.com/organizations/131-greenpeace/
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-29/chevron-s-19-billion-disaster-gets-hearing-corporate-canada.html
ReplyDeleteGET A MAP AND CHECK OUT HOW BIG ECUADOR IS COMPARED TO RUSSIA - THEN COMPARE THE TWO COUNTRIES BIODIVERSITY - THEN AT LEAST THINK ABOUT 1.26 BILLION GALLONS OF OIL THAT ANNUALLY POLLUTES RUSSIA COMPARED TO THE 18 BILLION GALLONS OF TOXIC SLUDGE DELIBERATELY DISCHARGED IN ECUADOR BY CHEVRON WHO FUND GREENPEACE SO THAT THEY DON'T CAMPAIGN AGAINST THEM!! THINK ABOUT IT! THINK ABOUT IT! AND NO, I DON'T WANT A HUG I JUST WANT YOU TO AT LEAST GO TO A QUIET PLACE AND THINK ABOUT IT! THINK ABOUT IT - DO I MAKE MY SELF CLEAR OR DO YOU NEED AN INTERPRETER?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thrivemovement.com/fact_checks
ReplyDeleteFollow the Money
Rockefeller Control of Oil Fact: The Rockefellers’ oil empire got started in 1870 when John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil and became America’s first billionaire. Standard Oil has since morphed into Exxon-Mobil and others. (read more)
In 1911, the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to oppose entities, such as monopolies or cartels that would harm competition. In theory, the act broke up John D. Rockefeller’s monopoly, Standard Oil. However, the reality is that the Rockefellers were able to maintain control over the spinoffs of Standard Oil, such as ExxonMobil, thus retaining a dominating presence in the oil industry, despite the intent of the law.
Sources:
Charles R. Morris. The Tycoons (150, 226).
Forbes: http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0702/gallery.richestamericans.fortune/index.html
Raymond William Goldsmith. "The Distribution of Ownership in the 200 Largest Non-Financial Corporations." U.S. Govt. Print. Off. (Washington), 1940.
Jim Marrs. "Rule by Secrecy," (46).
Joseph Kahn. "Big Oil: The Old Dynasty." New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/03/business/big-oil-the-old-dynasty-an-oil-giant-would-lack-a-rockefeller.html?pagewanted=1